Posts Tagged ‘Clinton’

3
Jun

Hillary Clinton Supporters

   Posted by: Doc   in News, Politics

Well, today is the last contest in the Presidential Primary Season. First a couple of predictions:

Obama will win South Dakota by less than 10 points, and will win in Montana by less than 15 points. I may be wrong on Montana, and it may be a walk for him there (because every democratic supporter I know there supports Obama, but this isn’t really a fair characterization, because I haven’t met a Clinton supporter yet this year.)

Which brings me to the topic of this post, and my last of the the primary analysis. I have in the past said a number of times that it is a good thing that Clinton has remained in the race, from an ideological point of view. But she is finished, her race is over. She will celebrate a successful campaign tonight, and may even concede, but she will not get the nomination, not tonight, not in August.

Now a lot of people are looking for answers as to why she lost: some people say it was poor organization, some people say it was her abrasive personality that turned a lot of people off, some claimed it was black voters who voted for one of their own instead of her. It is true that Clinton never considered the possibility that she might not win. I watched an interview she did with Katie Couric last year, where Couric asked Clinton if she had considered what she would do if she didn’t get the nomination, and she responded, “You just can’t think like that, Katie.” As if, don’t mention it, because if you do, you are beaten. OR, don’t mention it because there is no possible way it will happen. Clinton and everyone else believed that she was supposed to be the nominee of the Party. It was time to go back and retry something that “worked” while William Clinton was President. It was time for a correction back to when things were supposed to be so good for the US. She was “inevitable”. Read the rest of this entry »

Today is the contest in the state of Pennsylvania. It is therefore apropos that the Wizard of S make a comment on it.

First the prediction: Clinton by 6 points, give or take 3.

What is behind the prediction? Well, let’s just call it a gut feeling. Clinton has been doing well in the state, though not as well today as a month ago. Obama has not been able to erode her support in the state to the point where he can win, so he will have to accept a single digit loss there. The cities are important for Obama, but the majority of the state is not city, and those areas tend to vote for Hillary. The “scandals” have not hurt Obama, but they also haven’t helped Clinton. So Clinton wins, as expected, and if I am wrong, I will issue a retraction.

Now to the accompanying analysis. Long have the political junkies in this country waited for another contest. SIX WEEKS! Over this time, we have seen the slugfest on television, but the one thing we haven’t seen is the effects that the hard campaign has had on the attitudes among not only the people in Pennsylvania, but also in the country. About a week or so ago, news reports began talking about Obama in terms of “When” not “if” he takes on McCain in the fall. Now Pundits say things like “What is Clinton doing?”, as if she had no reason to continue the process, and should have dropped out.

But these last few weeks demonstrate clearly why she stayed in the race after March. She has been able to continue promoting her agenda, even though she now faces an overwhelming tide of support for Obama in the country, on the television, and in people’s mind. She is now running the classic protest campaign, and I say good for her. The Socialist Party would do well to take at least this lesson from her: when you know you aren’t going to win, you stop trying to win and start saying what you really mean. She is in a position to put her real agenda out there, because it is very unlikely that she will have to implement any of it, OR defend it for very long. She knows she will probably not get the nomination, nor will she be considered for VP, so she has the latitude that Obama does not have, and that is the freedom to use the “kitchen sink” and whatnot.

Some seem to think that Clinton’s continued participation in the primaries is damaging the Democratic Party. Many television commentators discuss this ad infinitum. I think that Obama accurately stated it on the Daily Show last night when he said that by October, this will be old news, but not for the reason he said. He said that eventually voters will see that there is a real difference between what McCain proposes and what generic Democrat, probably Obama proposes, and they will forget the bickering. Yeah, but this is not why they will vote Democrat.

First consider this Hypothetical Distribution of votes in the US electorate this year. Distribution of US voters in 2008 This is on the standard left-right spectrum, and everything is clearly labeled. Read the rest of this entry »