Archive for February, 2008

25
Feb

In response to Obam-ania

   Posted by: Doc   in News, Politics, Religion

It has been appropriately referred to as a mania: The tendency of supporters of Senator Barack Obama to WILDLY and illogically support their candidate, the tendency for his rallies to turn into something like religious experiences, where the people who witness his speeches experience a sort of ecstasy, and the tendency for people to measure their support for him in terms of charisma rather than his positions on policy. You hear it in the news, you see it on Saturday Night Live, you read about it in a million idiotic blogs written by Democrats in our country. And yet, few seem to know what he actually believes. Without wasting my time finding a citation, this has been one of the many criticisms leveled at the Senator by those who have apparently been able to resist the mania, usually because they support one of his opponents, or nobody at all.

And of course the criticism is fair. Only recently, Obama shifted from talking less like an inspirational speaker and more like a politician seeking nomination for the Presidency. Perhaps he finally got the message. Read the rest of this entry »

6
Feb

Super Tuesday Dustup

   Posted by: Doc   in News, Politics

I’m not going to say much about the Republican results. To be honest, I don’t really care too much who they nominate, it’s not like they will be any different than the same old garbage which has inhabited the White House over the course of my life. It is suprising that McCain has come back from the dead and now it looks like, unless he really screws up, he will get the nomination of their Party. So good for him, bad for the social conservatives. Too bad, so sad, they lose after just a few short bright happy years, and they get sent back to the hole in the ground from whence they were dragged. Huckabee is in a position to become a VP candidate, Romney may as well hang it up.

As for the Dems, this is where the race is interesting: Obama and Clinton basically split the votes, with Clinton grabbing California, New York, Jersey, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Arizona, while Obama got Illinois, Georgia, Delaware, Alabama, Missouri, Minnesota, Kansas, Colorado, Utah, NoDak, Connecticut, Idaho, and a mighty win in Alaska. New Mexico is still out, as usual (for some reason the people in that state like to turn in their results a week after the fact, but it is literally WAY too close to call: at the time of this post, there are precisely 71 votes separating Obama from his next nearest challenger, Clinton, though Edwards got 2000 votes…)

So what does it all mean? Well, let me give you my semi-expert analysis: First, depending on who you look at, you tend to get different numbers. Read the rest of this entry »